I've never heard a single liberal preface attacks on Oliver North with a recitation of North's magnificent service as a Marine. And unlike Murtha, who refuses to release his medical records showing he was entitled to his two Purple Hearts, we know what North did. (These Democrat military veterans are hardly shrinking violets when it comes to citing their medals, but they get awfully squeamish when pressed for details.)
Beyond wanting to investigate and question the worthiness of Jack Murtha's Vietnam medals, Coulter is also upset that more people didn't talk about Murtha the way the courageous Rep. Jean Schmidt did, who called Murtha a "coward" but then afterwards pretended that she didn't. Coulter described Schmidt's comment about Murtha as nothing more than "an indisputably true remark," and praised Schmidt as the only Congressman who "did not offer to have sex with Jack Murtha on the House floor."
Coulter says that she is also upset about the fact that Republicans commended Jack Murtha's military service when he announced his belief that American troops should be withdrawn, but Democrats didn't do the same thing for Rep. Randy Cunningham this week once Cunningham pled guilty to taking huge bribes in exchange for pressuring the Defense Dept. to award military contracts to his benefactors:
And yet, no Democrat breathed a word of Cunningham's unquestioned heroism before rushing to denounce him as "the latest example of the culture of corruption" — in the words of Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
That's because there is, of course, no meaningful difference between expressing an anti-war view (as Murtha did) and accepting millions of dollars in bribes (as Cunningham did), so -- other than stark unfairness towards Republicans -- how can one possibly explain the glaring difference in the levels of respect accorded to Murtha and Cunningham?
I realize that much of what Coulter says -- like the behavior of a guffawing 14-year-old boy -- is deliberately designed to shock and offend. But when you seek to attract attention to yourself by engaging in behavior that is so lowly and depraved that others are unable to avoid looking, the price you're at least supposed to pay in exchange for this sort of attention is ostracism.
But Coulter never has to pay that price. That's because no matter how repulsive, irrational, or clownishly hate-filled she gets, Republicans still treat her as some sort of serious thinker and pundit, and none of them will repudiate her.
I wonder if the RNC is preparing commercials featuring a few Republican marines who served with Jack Murtha and who have been harboring 35-year grudges against him because he was really a coward who didn't deserve his medals.
I think many Republicans are itching to start questioning the bravery of anyone, even decorated war veterans, who start opposing the war. It began with Kerry, and now we are seeing it with Murtha.
ReplyDeleteAnd, as the excellent post you put up a couple days ago about torture shows, they are itching to do it to John McCain to, argue that he broke down as a POW and signed a statement against his country so now he's a coward and a traitor.
At some point, Americans have to put a stop to these attacks on our veterans, especially by those who always wrap themselves in the love of military.
I have to take breaks from stuff like this every once in a while because it boggles my mind how people can actualy believe stuff like this. I can only think that Dr. Sanity said it best:
ReplyDeletehttp://drsanity.blogspot.com/2005/11/in-denial.html
Actually, Ann Coulter has been "repudiated" by conservative thinkers at least once. National Review - I can't remember if it was NR Online or their hard copy issue - dropped a column of hers, and the publisher/author relationship was severed. So, yes, she's a flamethrower (and some people like that), but she does get analyzed, critqued, and reprimanded from the right side of the political spectrum.
ReplyDelete