Thursday, January 05, 2006

Post-Sharon Israel

Even in the simplest times, the domestic political situation in Israel is incredibly complex and impossible to really decipher without paying close attention to it on a daily basis and over a long period of time. A reader of this blog, the (mildly) Likudnik D.E., is such a person, and here is what he says, by e-mail, about the current situation in Israel in light of what looks to be Ariel Sharon's imminent death or long-term incapacitation:

Palestine is falling apart. And regardless of what happens with Sharon's health, he's dead politically. A huge campaign funding scandal just erupted yesterday more serious than the previous two. His son just pled guilty to charges in another scandal and had to abandon his Knesset seat. The Palestinian territories have descended into utter chaos. The borders Sharon agreed to abandon are being used to smuggle in much more advanced weaponry. Quassam rockets are fired into Israel uninterruptedly and are reaching closer and closer to major population bases. And, now, al Qaeda is now conducting attacks on Israel from the northern border and, they suspect, Gaza.

I think all this adds up to Netanyahu's return. I've been feeling this in my gut for a couple of weeks and now with Sharon's latest heart emergency, I'm fairly certain that despite his poor standing in polls, Bibi will be back shortly. Bibi's return, together with Hamas' ascendancy and the total breakdown of Palestinian society, will mean this whole thing will be getting a lot worse.

I asked him whether he thought that the fact that Sharon was about to be widely glorified and eulogized would prevent Israelis from turning to his political enemy, Netanyahu, and this is what he said:

Netanyahu won last time after Rabin was assassinated in an atmosphere where the country was literally blaming the right wing for the assassination.

This would be a piece of cake, comparatively. But, ultimately, Netanyahu isn't the insane warmongering right winger he's made out to be. He'll cave into the Americans, but only after making himself unwelcome. Clinton hated him. Bush will hate him too. He's slick, very smart, arrogant and insecure on the deepest level. Unlike Sharon, this isn't a guy Bush would feel a connection with.

I think that will have implications in the region. The centrist impulse embodied by Sharon enjoys massive support in Israel. The centrist idea is that the Left's idea of a negotiated treaty obviously failed, the Right's idea of holding on to every inch and ruling over the Palestinians failed and is undesirable for many reasons in any event, thus, we will disengage from the Pals and draw our own borders for the time being until the situation changes and the Pals get their act together. It's a creative, politically difficult and potentially dangerous solution, but people trusted Sharon and he bulldozed his way around the political landscape by his force of will. It's not clear whether people will trust his quasi-successor, Ehud Olmert, who, in my opinion, is a real yutz (knucklehead). That guy has no gravitas.

The real tragedy for Israel is that the Sharon plan will probably die with him. The situation will change drastically. The last five years, everyone in the Middle East, the Arabs, Jews, Quartet, has been reacting to Sharon. In a stagnant situation, while everyone was paralyzed, Sharon was moving and pushing and taking initiatives. And everyone else just stood around watching, not quite knowing how to do. Everyone was watching, with eagerness, concern, and mostly, curiosity, what the next step Sharon would take, what Sharon was up to, what he was doing, what was his plan. It's pretty remarkable when you think about it.

Regardless of what else one though of Ariel Sharon, it did seem as though he was the only Israeli leader with both the hawkish credibility and requisite sanity to forge a real peace. It was hardly a foregone conclusion that he would or could achieve that, but it at least looked possible. It looks less possible today.

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:34 PM

    Glenn, the first anonymous is right, if not a little overboard. Ariel Sharon is a killer, a monster, and a maniac. He gave up Gaza for strategic advantage, not because he turned over a new leaf. The sooner he is dead, the better for everyone, Israeils and Palestinians alike.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous7:01 PM

    Sharon a hope for PEACE? The butcher of Saba and Shatila? One of the architects and executioners of the fascist manifest destiny bantuization of the Palestinian "state"? The provocateur of the Intifada? Somebody must've forgotten to deliver him his bucket of baby entrails and mothers' milk... That terrorist ghoul is dying oh, say, only about 50 years too late.

    I meant to say, 80.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:02 PM

    Agreed, anonymous is right. Sharon directly caused the latest intifada for politcal advantage. Under Sharon, Israel expanded settlements, not diminished them. He is among the most calculating politicians in the world, bent on destroying Palestine. To think of him as some sort of newfound pragmatist is absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hate to say it but Israel's only real hope for peace was if Sharon could do a "De Gaulle" and withdraw from most of the West Bank and Gaza. The Left in Israel seems hopeless on security issues and Bibi is an LGF'er neo-fascist. Yes, Sharon was a war criminal but he was also, if one remembers his crossing of the Suex in 1973, the only Israeli statesman who could have pulled off the task of drawing Israel's final borders. With the Middle East getting nuked-up, it is a shame Sharon never finished the job. The Charles de Gaulle types only come around once a century -- at best.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very good summation by your friend who sent the e-mail I would however disagree with 2 points he made about Netanyahu I would not judge him as insecure any thing but, I also think he will get along with Bush. The man is a very strong anti=terrorist and also one of the only Israeli leaders to drive for makinig Israel financialy independant from the US as much as possible

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous1:23 AM

    Sharon had a long career as a terrorist and war criminal, going back to his activities leading Unit 101, from 1948 to 1953, which included the murder of civilians in neighboring countries and the murder of 69 women and children in the village of Qibya, then within Jordanian territory. He is known to have murdered captured prisoners of war in 1956, and possibly in 1967 and 1973. The invasion of Lebanon and the siege of Beirut were in fact war crimes, and he compounded this with deliberate breaches of peace agreements and of course the massacres of Sabra and Shattilla. His life was drenched in atrocity, he walked in footsteps filled with blood. He was simply a human monster.

    And this poor old world of ours has enough of those running around.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bravo to Greenwald to let these comments up and stay. The more the issue is talked out the less suspicion and hostility towards Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous4:03 PM

    Well, I follow Israeli politics pretty closely, and I don't see the return of Netanyahu anywhere in the cards. Bibi won the first time, over all-Universe election loser Shimon Peres, precisely because Peres didn't draw enough of a line between the Likud right and the Assassin right.

    Some of the changes Sharon wrought are irreversible. Do you think after Sharon used the word "occupation" the settler movement will be able to cow the entire center of the Israeli polity back into the deceptive euphemisms of colonialism? And as the settlers well know, the Separation Fence leaves at least some space (even if, and I admit this, inadequate) for the non-Jews of Palestine. The rhetoric of Greater Israel is dead. Who exactly is Bibi going to lead? So he can be Mayor of Ariel. That's a long way from PM.

    The Sharon plan for Israel's security is working. Where are the suicide bombers now? The real struggle will be who will lead Kadima in Sharon's stead, and what shadings of opinion they will have. Olmert, for example, has always been an ambitious political opportunist (with a very liberal wife). Peres would love a chance to lead another ticket to defeat.

    ReplyDelete