(updated below)
Several items regarding How Would a Patriot Act?:
(1) I can only laugh at the petulant complaints over at National Review and elsewhere that no liberal bloggers have reviewed or discussed Ramesh Ponnuru's anti-abortion screed, Party of Death. Kevin Drum summarized quite well many of the reasons why Ponnuru's book isn't the earth-shattering literary event which National Review, Ann Coulter and Peggy Noonan have been claiming that it is. Atrios and Ezra Klein add some thoughts to Kevin's argument.
Beyond that, though, it is hardly the case that right-wing bloggers lavish attention on books which advance arguments with which they disagree. Despite the fact that my book's blogger-based ascent to the top of the Amazon Best Seller List is itself a blogosphere story -- and was prominently featured as such by The San Francisco Chronicle and Publishers Weekly, among others -- not a single conservative blogger as much as mentioned the book in passing, let alone reviewed it. My book is a blogosphere book, and has sales far in excess of Ponnuru's book almost exclusively as a result of blogger promotion and blogospheric word of mouth. But if you only read right-wing and pro-Bush blogs, you would have no idea that the book even existed, because not a single one of them has even mentioned it, let alone reviewed it.
Approximately a month ago, my publisher e-mailed several conservative bloggers asking if they would be willing to review the book on their blog or elsewhere (and obviously offered to send a review copy of the book), and not a single one was willing to do so. Byron York did write an article in National Review on the book's pre-release marketing success, but York hadn't even read the book yet (because it hadn't been released) and said nothing about its content other than to dismiss it as "an indictment of George W. Bush of the sort that has become commonplace on the Left in the last few years."
Most right-wing blogs studiously ignore what takes place outside of their self-referential circle. I read the Corner almost every day and can't recall a single liberal book that was ever mentioned there even in passing, let alone reviewed -- not Crashing the Gate, not the books by Tom Tomorrow or David Sirota, not Eric Boehlert's recently released Lapdogs. To hear them complaining that liberal blogs aren't paying sufficient attention to Ponnuru's anti-abortion book is really just bizarre.
(2) Although the book tour has not started yet (it begins June 5 at the University of Florida, followed by various San Francisco events beginning on June 6, and then Las Vegas, Washington, New York, Boston and New York again - with several changes/additions possible), I have been doing one radio interview after the next almost on a daily basis, and Working Assets has begun actively promoting the book. As a result, the book has returned to the Top 100 on Amazon, and has risen to #2 on Powell's Best Seller List. The current goal for elevating the visibility of the book is to ensure that it debuts on The New York Times' Bestseller List, something which, according to those who understand these things, seems likely (though not certain) based on the book's selling trends.
(3) Over the next couple of days, Jennifer Nix of Working Assets is going to write posts on various blogs, including this one, suggesting ways for how those who are inclined to help promote the book can do so. How much of an impact the book can have is obviously a by-product of how much attention it receives, which, in turn, is determined by how well it sells. One way to begin is for those who have read the book to leave reviews on Amazon and other online retailers. Apparently, informative reviews -- especially those written by people who seem to have actually read the book -- can play a significant role in helping to promote the book.
UPDATE: Jennifer Nix has a post up at FDL documenting how the publishing industry looks at the blogosphere (not with great fondness, unsurprisingly). One of the FDL commenters, Tony Finnerty, provided a link for a Letter to the Editor he wrote, which was published by his local Nevada newspaper, regarding the new NSA data-collection progarm, in which he mentioned How Would a Patriot Act? In general, writing Letters to the Editor and particuarly Op-Eds in local newspapers is an under-utilized method for influencing public political discussions.
Im going now to my local B&N to buy a couple more copies. The book is so cheap that I really intend to give it to as many GOP and Independent friends I have. I have read 30% of it and I have no doubt that is one of its unique appeals. It makes an argument that is no non-partisan and so American that it will appeal to anyone with an open, rational mind.
ReplyDeleteThank you for writing it!!
when/where in gainesville?
ReplyDeleteIf Ramesh won't even take his own book - and its disgustingly peurile and imflammatory tile seriously - why should anyone.
ReplyDeleteHe backed off the title every time I see him. See Jon Stewart for proof.
As far as I can tell, he's a coward in intellectual's clothing.
My discussion of the book is here.
ReplyDeleteI also made some of the materials I sent to Glenn as his researcher available for those that want them, along with links to about a hundred articles on Bush.
To hear them complaining that liberal blogs aren't paying sufficient attention to Ponnuru's anti-abortion book is really just bizarre.
ReplyDeleteNot bizarre, just the usual double-standard that inferior minds cling to.
.
Just got (and read) the book yesterday. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteOf course, you need to be careful in a: inviting people you disagree with to review your book and B; inviting people to write amazon reviews. You never know when this might happen!
ReplyDeleteJust got the book yesterday, but haven't had a chance to read it.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, I want to congratulate you on writing a real book. When you said that you were working on a (paperback) book in your spare time, I figured it would be a 60 page pamphlet with really huge margins -- something lofty in substance, but short in length.
Obviously, I was wrong about the legnth part. Now I can't wait to digest what it actually says
Secondly, I suspect you know what's coming soon: a Drudge report saying that your book is barely selling.....
I'd be happy to promote your book on my little blog, Glenn, though I can't say that the three people who read my blog will boost your sales much!
ReplyDeleteI checked over at Barnes & Noble yesterday and the book was ranked @ 868, TODAY it's ranked at 177!! Now that's movement!
ReplyDeleteGot the book yesterday, about 2/3s through after a couple subway rides. It's got a very nice economy of style. You should be proud.
ReplyDeleteOne quick note: the link to Kevin Drum is busted.
ReplyDeleteGlenn:
ReplyDeleteSan Francisco area schedule?
Love to see you at Kepler's in Menlo Park (my home town now).
Cheers,
Ummm, here's the link for contact info:
ReplyDeleteKepler's Books & Magazines.
Cheers,
Glenn,
ReplyDeleteJust received my copy of the book in the mail yesterday. I am looking foreward to reading it in the next few weeks when my schedule gets less hectic.
Got the book today as well and plan on a nice eventful, fact-filled evening. I have had quite enough of the political sleight of hand/bulging sleeve bit. Congrats on the book Glenn and keep 'em coming.
ReplyDeleteDebra E. said, "and so American that it will appeal to anyone with an open, rational mind."
ReplyDeleteThis reminds me of a story about Adlai Stevenson's campaign for the presidency. After delivering a speech, he was approached by someone from the audience who told him, "Every thinking American who hears this will undoubtedly vote for you." Stevenson's reply, "I'm afraid that won't be enough for me to win."
Sadly, this somewhat pessimistic estimation of the collective intellect may be even more true today.
Glenn--
ReplyDeleteGot the book yesterday, started reading it today. Your blog is my main essential daily visit for political commentary, and so far the book lives up to the standard you've demonstrated here.
Also--
"The King and Yoo", great title! :)
Jeff
Just got my copy in the mail today. I intend to hold it so that the cover is clearly visible when I'm reading it on the train over the next couple of days. Every little bit helps!
ReplyDeleteI distincly remember seeing that LA was on your tour.
ReplyDeleteGood memory. L.A. has been temporarily taken off becasue there was some uncertainty about the principal event. To be honest, I really don't want to travel to 1,000 cities, and so I'm fighting to ensure that I'm only going somewhere when there are really large enough events/media commitments to justify the travel - but L.A. is one of those cities that very well may be added back on.
"The King and Yoo", great title!
The credit, or shame, for that goes to the Safir Ahmed, the book's Editor. Picking those titles and sub-titles was the very last thing we did, and it came at the end of a 22-hour day, on the very last deadline day, and we were as giddy as we were tired. When he said it, we all burst out laughing for like 20 minutes. Afterwards, I had real reservations about whether it was too frivolous to include (plus, word plays with someone's name, even if it's funny, is slightly juvenile, at least). But ultimately it was too entertaining to omit it, so the compromise was that it would remain as a sub-title, but not a chapter title.
Really, it owes its existence to the late hour.
I intend to hold it so that the cover is clearly visible when I'm reading it on the train over the next couple of days.
Very creative. Thank you. I once had a client who developed this product - this weird "anxiety doll" - that people with anxiety problems were supposed to hug and feel better and calmer. They wanted to find ways to promote it, so they paid people to ride across the country on airplanes, look scared, and hold and hug this doll for the whole flight. Your idea is similar, but much more efficient and dignified.
Oddly, on the Amazon page for Mr. Greenwald's book, the "What do customers ultimately buy after viewing items like this?" section has 13% of people buying The Party of Death.
ReplyDeleteCheers
Went out to mow the lawn this morning and found my Amazon box waiting at the front gate.
ReplyDeleteThree copies, one for me, one for mom and one for that father in law ditto head.
Hope it doesn't cause to much of a family rift.
San Francisco!
ReplyDeleteJust make sure it's around the weekend, I've got night law school during the week.
Can't wait to hear you speak and congratulate/thank you personally.
Glenn:
ReplyDeleteSend me a copy. I would be glad to review it here for you.
Jimmy's comments post reading:
ReplyDeleteThis is another one of the many books written by Bush supporters who, after seeing what Bush is doing, have elected to open thier minds to the possibility that the leadership of America has fallen short of the ideologies upon which America was originally built. Being hit in the face with events perpetrated by those you have elected to trust with all you beleive in, sometimes make them write about their reactions to such events. This is one of those books. I have read many of them and I am just waiting for one to show me how to load a rifle and start a revolution; or to point to the actions to keep America what it was originally intended. Our Constitution is a valuable document, but only if you have the people that want to support it and to act upon protecting its ideology. It is a fast and clear read, but after I finished it I placed it with the others in my library. I wonder if I will ever pick it up again. I certainly will join this blog, however.
I think you have an M.O. here. There's a website I go to sometimes that is basically a tech-driven newsite called "Newsvine." People suggest stories to follow, write opinion pieces and so on, and others respond. Like a collective blog. Well, two of the headings are "Republicans" and "Democrats." In the Republican heading, it's all Republican-generated stories about how great the economy is and how triumphant the Chimp is. But under the Democrats heading, half of the articles are also Republican-generated: all about how the crazy, angry left wants to boot out Lieberman, how uncivil we are to John McCain, and so on.
ReplyDeleteThe point is, they troll. We don't.
I'm awaiting my copy of your book.
Glenn,
ReplyDeleteI just got my copy from the Amazon pre-order. I am about 1/3 the way through.
Quite a literary accomplishment.
The Rights' condemnation as an attack on Bush is ridiculous. Their unitary takeover has been in the works for years. Your ability to 'connect the dots' and expose this as an assault on our democracy and constitution is the wake up call that is needed.
Please make a visit to Ann Arbor. You will be quite pleased with the non-acceptance of Bushco's crimes.
Thank you again Glenn. I am looking forward to curling up with a 'good' book tonite!
The resume-inflating blowhard HWSNBN said:
ReplyDeleteGlenn:
Send me a copy. I would be glad to review it here for you.
Ummmm, reviews (other than by the likes of your intellectual comrade-in-arms Ben Dommenech) require that one actually read the book, and that you actually understand and respond to what's written. You've shown a propensity for neither of these things.
Tell you what, Mr. "Criminal Prosecutor": Why don't you buy your own copy, and why don't you start your own blog, and post the review on your blog. I'm quite sure that it will get all the attention it deserves over there.
Cheers,
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThe point is, they troll. We don't!
ReplyDeleteHave you ever been to Protein Wisdom?! I'm eternally grateful to those who do (thanks Glenn), so I don't have to. They make my skin crawl!
Just got my copies today! Can't wait to read the book.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, regarding the breaking FBI break-in story, I received the following email which I will reprint in its entirety. I find the viewpoint of the writer of the email persuasive.
The first part is a quote about the emergence of Nazism in Germany, and the next is the writer commenting on the reaction of our own politicians to the story about the FBI break-in.
sound familiar?
"What happened was the gradual habituation of the people, little by
little, to be governed by surprise, to receiving decisions deliberated
in secret; to believe that the situation was so complicated that the
government had to act on information which the people could not
understand, or so dangerous that, even if people could understand it,
it could not be released because of national security. . .
To live in the process is absolutely not to notice it -- please try to
believe me -- unless one has a much greater degree of political
awareness, acuity, than most of us ever had occasion to develop.
Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on
occasion, 'regretted.' . . . Believe me this is true. Each act, each
occasion is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for
the next and the next. You wait for one shocking occasion, thinking
that others, when such a shock comes, will join you in resisting
somehow. . Suddenly it all comes down, all at once. . You
remember everything now, and your heart breaks. Too late. You are
compromised beyond repair."
---German professor describing to American journalist
Milton Mayer the arrival of Nazism
They didn't give a rat's behind when the bushtapo were trampling OUR rights, but now that theirs are being squeezed, they are jumping up and down. Too little, too late.
Gee, what is their problem with having their places raided if they're not guilty of anything? Isn't that the same as not caring about having your communications eavesdropped on if you're not a terrorist?
Besides, the patriot act says the government can do whatever it wants to. It broke plenty of precedents--what's another one? they should know--they voted for it. now they are complaining about their rights? What rights? Are they on drugs?
Bloomberg FBI story:
Congressional Leaders Challenge FBI Raid on U.S. House Office
May 23 (Bloomberg) -- House and Senate leaders challenged the constitutionality of an FBI raid on a lawmaker's office, saying it broke a 219-year precedent and raised concerns about the separation of power between the administration and Congress.
``The actions of the Justice Department in seeking and executing this warrant raise important constitutional issues,'' House Speaker Dennis Hastert, an Illinois Republican, said in a statement last night. ``I expect to seek a means to restore the delicate balance of power among the branches of government that the founders intended.''
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California and Senate Majority Leader Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican, also expressed concern about the constitutional implications of the Saturday night raid of Louisiana Democratic Representative William Jefferson's office in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill.
Jefferson's office was searched as part of a federal bribery investigation in which Jefferson was also videotaped accepting a leather briefcase containing $100,000 in cash from a government witness, according to an FBI affidavit.
A former aide to Jefferson, Brett Pfeffer, 37, pleaded guilty Jan. 11 to bribery and conspiracy charges for helping in a kickback scheme involving a Nigerian telecommunications company. Jefferson hasn't been charged with a crime.
Yesterday, the lawmaker reasserted his innocence and said he doesn't plan to leave Congress.
`Two Sides'
``There are two sides to every story,'' Jefferson, 59, told reporters at a Capitol Hill news conference. He said he intends to ``carry on with my responsibilities and represent the people who have sent me here.'' He refused to discuss the specifics of the case or allegations by the government.
He also denounced the Federal Bureau of Investigation for searching his office, calling it ``outrageous'' and ``unprecedented.''
Hastert said in his statement that every congressional office contains documents protected by the constitutional principle of the separation of powers. Those protections, and the independence of the legislative branch, ``must be respected in order to prevent overreaching and abuse of power by the executive branch,'' he said.
The speaker said it ``would appear'' that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was aware the Justice Department had entered ``constitutionally suspect grounds'' in conducting the raid because the FBI suggested in seeking a warrant that it would create special procedures to step around the constitutional issues.
`Constitutional Problems'
``It is not at all clear to me that it would even be possible to create special procedures that would overcome the constitutional problems that the execution of this warrant has created,'' Hastert said.
He said that ``since the founding of our republic 219 years ago, the Justice Department has never found it necessary to do what it did Saturday night, crossing this separation of powers line in order to successfully prosecute corruption by members of Congress.'' Hastert said the materials sought in the search of Jefferson's office had already been subpoenaed and that ``all the documents that have been subpoenaed were being preserved.''
Legal Counsel
Frist told reporters that he asked the Senate legal counsel for advice on the raid's constitutional implications and the ``proper course of action'' for the Senate.
Pelosi also issued a statement raising concerns about whether the search undermined the separation of powers.
The Jefferson case is one of several continuing criminal probes of lawmakers.
Former Representative Randy Cunningham, a California Republican, is in prison after admitting accepting $2.4 million in bribes. Representative Robert Ney, an Ohio Republican, has relinquished a committee chairmanship because of a federal investigation into his dealings with former lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, a Texas Republican, will leave office next month after being indicted in a state fund-raising case. DeLay and Ney have denied wrongdoing.
To contact the reporters on this story:
Jonathan D. Salant in Washington at
jsalant@bloomberg.net;
Laura Litvan in Washington at llitvan@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: May 23, 2006 00:03 EDT
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aTRe0ri0mS5k&refer=top_world_news#
Pelosi, Frist, etc: Too little. Too late.
Where are you appearing on your book tour? Would you place a link to a tour-events page on your left navbar? Thanks, and keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteWhere are you appearing on your book tour? Would you place a link to a tour-events page on your left navbar?
ReplyDeleteARNE AND OTHERS - As soon as I have specific information for the tour, which should be over the next couple of days, I will post it.
Glenn: Your update says that Jennifer Nix discusses how "the publishing industry looks at the blogosphere (not with great fondness, unsurprisingly)."
ReplyDeleteThat's neither fair nor accurate. Jennifer's article discussed her conversations with three critic-journalists ("the deputy editor of the Washington Post’s Book World, a national editor of The Atlantic, and a book editor from USA Today").
As a director of markeing for a publisher, let me assure you, we take blogs very seriously. I've run ads on blogs; we send review copies to several blogs; we pray that the more prominent blogs will give our new titles the slightest mention. And many publishers are now trying to work out book deals with bloggers as well (as you certainly know).
Finally, if there's one thing in common between the complaints you hear among bloggers and those you'll hear from many of us in the publishing industry, it's our opinion of reviewers in the MSM--places like USA Today, Washington Post, and Atlantic.
I got your book yesterday. I'm looking forward to reading it. With regard to the amazon tallies that anon referenced -- it works both ways -- I suggest going to the Party of Death page at amazon and then buying Glenn's book. If you look at the numbers, last I checked, most bought King Dork after viewing the NRO guy's book. You could add to the ones who purchase Glenn's book after viewing the other book's site.
ReplyDeleteI would advocate that Glenn send the poor impoverished Bart a copy. As an alternative, perhaps there is one here who could do it? My only suggestion would be that if Bart refutes anything in Glenn's book, that he not only quote the book but also learn how to manage HTML links and that those links only be to pdf's of legal findings. Otherwise, he gets deleted. I did (got my comments deleted), and I don't mind, so Bart shouldn't either if he meets whatever rules Glenn sets out.
Your update reminds me of the coalition with C&L and FDL with regard to call-ins and letters. I've always known that personally written letter were very persuasive -- I encouraged my co-worker from Kansas to join in that endevour and he actually carried it over to writing to his reps and senators here in Texas as well.
Thanks Glenn, for all you have done and continue to do.
Well done!
Hey! Glenn's book is now #1 on Powells.com. That makes two booksellers where Glenn has topped the charts!
ReplyDeleteEveryone should now buy from Barnes and Noble so it will be a trifecta.
Meet Lucille D., an elderly neighbor of mine, and part of the "angry left". Lucille is in her 70s now and her health isn't as good as it should be. Lucille was raised on a farm in "the heartland". A lifelong Republican, like most of her neighbors at the senior citizen's apartments on our block, I visit with Lucille often to help her with her errands because she can no longer drive herself. I have to keep reminding her, and many of her friends, that if they were to repeat what they often tell me they would like to do to Bush, they would be guilty of a crime and probably get a visit from the FBI or Secret Service. I'm not kidding. They don't realize how much things have changed in this country. They just know they don't like it here any more, they are too old to leave and this is not how they intended to spend their golden years. I don't know where this "angry left" myth comes from but I have my suspicions. I don't know whether the people who propagate the myth, like Chris Matthews, do so because they are complicit or just stupid and out of touch. It doesn't really matter. He should talk to Lucille. I suppose that explains it really. An idiot like Matthews hasn't talked to a real American person in years. We are all the angry left about now.
ReplyDeleteGlenn Greenwald - Most right-wing blogs studiously ignore what takes place outside of their self-referential circle. I read the Corner almost every day and can't recall a single liberal book that was ever mentioned there even in passing, let alone reviewed
What's a "liberal book"? There are no "liberal books". There are books and then there is crap and propaganda.
Pelosi, Frist, etc: Too little. Too late.
ReplyDeleteSo true. If only Ayn Rand would run for office... Who cares if she's dead?
Paul Rosenberg... Kryptonite, however, still might have a chance.
ReplyDeleteMark Zaid, a national security law specialist, said that very thing tonite on Olberman with respect to the naked power grab by the executive that is transpiring. It was a good interview and segment.
Pelosi, Frist, etc: Too little. Too late.
It is amusing to watch trolls like you try and tar Pelosi with the same brush as Frist. Amusing, but unconvincing. This is a better description of you than her.
[You] didn't give a rat's behind when the bushtapo were trampling OUR rights, but now that [yours] are being squeezed, [you] are jumping up and down. Too little, too late.
Why on earth would anyone want to read anything more from Bart? He lies, misrepresents, and then lies some more. I'm feeling guilty just by giving him the attention of this post.
ReplyDeleteYou wrote a book?
ReplyDeleteAs a liberal gone conservative, and as a conservative gone liberal, I think this book will be a joy to read.
ReplyDeleteAndrew
Glen:
ReplyDeleteI received and read the book on Tuesday, May 23 and thought it was a very important defense of the Constitution.
This morning I wrote to "Powerline" and asked them to respond to your arguments. I even offered to buy them their own copy.
You should come to Sarasota before you go to Gainesville. We could set up a major event here on short notice.
Keep up the fine work,
Adam Tebrugge Sarasota, Florida
The difference between the right and left. Drum thinks it's just Bush, but he is still "stoopid" enough to believe that there actually is a conservative "policy" that isn't more about selling a pig in a poke to people who should know about pigs and pork by dint of having grown up on pig farms. It explains why Glenn's book, (or any other serious work), won't get a review from the right.
ReplyDeletebart said...
ReplyDeleteGlenn:
Send me a copy. I would be glad to review it here for you.
Wow, there probably isn't a reviewer's opinions who I could care less about.
Hey Glen,
ReplyDeleteYour book arrived last night. Read the preface and chapter 1. A great read so far. Welcome to the politically concerned community.
I vote for dead people said...
ReplyDeletePelosi, Frist, etc: Too little. Too late.
So true. If only Ayn Rand would run for office... Who cares if she's dead?
That's not fair and it's very mean-spirited. EWO has never suggested he thought Ayn Rand should hold elected office, even if she is dead. In fact, he has said he much prefers Lou Dobbs, and thinks he would make a great president. He said so right here on these threads. Lou Dobbs = CCC = KKK, and Lou Dobbs appears to be very much alive. All that make-up just makes him look like he's dead, and the white sheet, too.
Other than to stir up publicity,
ReplyDeletewhy would conservative bloggers want to review a book that is more-than-likely to be unflattering to Bush apologists and neocons alike?
Anxiously awaiting my copy...
why would conservative bloggers want to review a book that is more-than-likely to be unflattering to Bush apologists and neocons alike?
ReplyDeleteBecause its subject matter is the abrogation of the Constitution and as such, it should be of deep concern to ALL Americans. The fact that it isn't is just a measure of how far we have compromised our principles in the name of partisan advantage.
Just my $0.02
The stoopids have been running our government.
ReplyDeleteDesperate for Supporters, DeLay Turns to Stephen Colbert
A good sign that Tom DeLay doesn’t have the facts on his side: the top source for his latest defense against his critics is Stephen Colbert.
This morning, DeLay’s legal defense fund sent out a mass email criticizing the movie “The Big Buy: Tom DeLay’s Stolen Congress,” by “Outfoxed” creator Robert Greenwald.
The email features a “one-pager on the truth behind Liberal Hollywood’s the Big Buy,” and the lead item is Colbert’s interview with Greenwald on Comedy Central (where Colbert plays a faux-conservative, O’Reilly-esque character). The headline of the “fact sheet”:
HOLLYWOOD PULLS MICHAEL MOORE ANTICS ON TOM DeLAY
COLBERT CRACKS THE STORY ON REAL MOTIVATIONS BEHIND THE MOVIE
DeLay thinks Colbert is so persuasive, he’s now featuring the full video of the interview at the top of the legal fund’s website. And why not? According to the email, Greenwald “crashed and burned” under the pressure of Colbert’s hard-hitting questions, like “Who hates America more, you or Michael Moore?”
Apparently the people at DeLay’s legal fund think that Colbert is actually a conservative. Or maybe they’re just that desperate for supporters.
JEEBUS! HEAVEN HELP US!
Glenn, that's just not true. I'm a conservative blogger, and I mentioned your book several times. I certainly would have gladly reviewed it if provided with a review copy. I don't have the audience the bloggers you mention have, but you once again have made a categorical broad brush statement that should be aimed at specific individuals.
ReplyDeleteI bought two copies of the book and my wife and I simultaneously read them. It's a modern day "Common sense" and I can only hope it will eventually inspire the same type of reaction against the Empire Bush is constructing while Congress stands idly by. I have to say it's given me some newfound respect for Alito and Scalia, at least with regard to Constitutional powers, and is seems a damn shame that our form of government may have to be rescued by ultra conservative Judges who otherwise have little concern for people matters. They, unlike Congress, recognize that their failure to take stands on these issues will make their role in government meaningless.
ReplyDeleteWe bought two copies so that we can be a lending library to those folks we can't convince to make the tiny investment in this fine work. Thank you Glenn.
Already on it.
ReplyDelete